Euroasian journal of hepato-gastroenterology

Register      Login

VOLUME 8 , ISSUE 1 ( January-June, 2018 ) > List of Articles

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Striking Multiple Primary Tumors that underwent Whipple Procedure due to Periampullary Carcinoma: An Analysis of 21 Cases

Osman N Dilek, Oguzhan Ozsay, Serkan Karaisli, Emine Ö Gür, Ahmet Er, Selda G Haciyanli, Haldun Kar, Fatma H Dilek

Keywords : Diagnosis, Multiple primary tumors, Pancreas, Treatment, Whipple procedure

Citation Information : Dilek ON, Ozsay O, Karaisli S, Gür EÖ, Er A, Haciyanli SG, Kar H, Dilek FH. Striking Multiple Primary Tumors that underwent Whipple Procedure due to Periampullary Carcinoma: An Analysis of 21 Cases. Euroasian J Hepatogastroenterol 2018; 8 (1):1-5.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10018-1249

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 01-08-2018

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2018; The Author(s).


Abstract

Introduction: The term multiple primary tumor (MPT) is used to describe cases where two or more primary tumors show no histopathological similarities in between. Multiple primary tumor cases have begun to increase in recent years as a result of the increase in life expectancy because of the increase in life standards and progress in diagnostic methods. In this study, MPT cases with periampullary tumors that underwent Whipple procedure were discussed in the light of literature data. Materials and methods: The patient files of 223 cases with periampullary tumors that underwent Whipple procedure in our hospital during the last 6 years were examined retrospectively. More than one primary tumor was detected in 21 patients. Results: Periampullary carcinomas were detected as a second primary tumor in 18 patients. First primary tumor was periampullary carcinoma in 3 patients that underwent Whipple procedure. After the Whipple procedure, 5 patients died due to early complications in the first 30 days and 6 patients died due to metastases and additional problems that developed during follow-up. Discussion: The incidence of MPT has been reported as 0.7 to 14.5% in the literature. Most of them are multiple primary case presentations. In patient management, it is recommended that each tumor should be evaluated independently of its own characteristics, and treatment and follow-up should be planned accordingly. Conclusion: The MPT cases are increasing. The possibility of MPT as well as metastasis should be kept in mind during the evaluation of tumor foci seen during diagnosis and follow-up of patients. The characteristics of each tumor, survival, and prognosis should be evaluated separately and the most appropriate treatment should be offered to the patient. It is recommended that synchronic primary tumors which are considered to be surgically resectable without metastasis should be removed in the same session.


PDF Share
  1. Bugher JC. The probability of the chance occurrence of multiple malignant neoplasms. Am J Cancer 1934 Aug; 21(4):2309-2824.
  2. Mariotto AB, Rowland JH, Ries LA, Scoppa S, Feuer EJ. Multiple cancer prevalence: a growing challenge in long-term survivorship. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2007 Mar;16(3):566-571.
  3. Irimie A, Achimas-Cadariu P, Burz C, Puscas E. Multiple primary malignancies- Epidemiological analysis at a single tertiary institution. J Gastrointestin Liver Dis 2010
  4. Luciani A, Ascione G, Marussi D, Oldani S, Caldiera S, Bozzoni S, Codecà C, Zonato S, Ferrari D, Foa P. Clinical analysis of multiple primary malignancies in the elderly. Med Oncol 2009;26(1):27-31.
  5. Zhao J, Tan Y, Wu Y, Zhao W, Wu J, Ji M, Shi L, Jiang J, Wu C. A rare case of eight multiple primary malignant neoplasms in a female patient: a case report and review of the literature. Oncol Lett 2015 Feb;9(2):587-590.
  6. Moertel CG. Multiple primary malignant neoplasms: historical perspectives. Cancer 1977 Oct;40(4 Suppl):1786-1792.
  7. Hayat MJ, Howlander N, Reichman ME. Cancer statistics, trends, and multiple primary cancer analysis from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program. Oncologist 2007 Jan;12(1):20-37.
  8. Mohammad AM, Al-Zahrani AS, EL-Khatib HM. Double primary cancers registered in tertiary care hospital: review of cases. J Case Reports 2014;4(1):72-76.
  9. Romaniuk, Lyndin M, Smiyanov V, Sikora V, Rieznik A, Kuzenko Y, Budko H, Moskalenko Y, Karpenko L, Sikora V, et al. Primary multiple tumor with affection of the thyroid gland, uterus, urinary bladder, mammary gland and other organs. Pathol Res Pract 2017 May;213(5):574-579.
  10. Bagri PK, Singh D, Singhal MK, Singh G, Mathur G, Jakhar SL, Beniwal S, Sharma N, Kumar HS, Sharma A, et al. Double primary malignancies: a clinical and pathological analysis report from a regional cancer institute in India. Iranian J Cancer Prev 2014 Spring;7(2):66-72.
  11. Amin S, McBride RB, Kline JK, Mitchel EB, Lucas AL, Neugut AI, Frucht H. Incidence of subsequent pancreatic adenocarcinoma in patients with a history of nonpancreatic primary cancers. Cancer 2012 Mar;118(5):1244-1251.
  12. Andersson G, Wennersten C, Borgquist S, Jirström K. Pancreatic cancer risk in relation to sex, lifestyle factors, and pre-diagnostic anthropometry in the Malmö Diet and Cancer Study. Biol Sex Differ 2016 Dec;7:66.
  13. Lynch HT, Harris RE, Lynch PM, Guirgis HA, Lynch JF, Bardawil WA. Role of heredity in multiple primary cancer. Cancer 1977 Oct;40(4 Suppl):1849-1854.
  14. Donovan EM, James H, Bonora M, Yarnold JR. Evans incidence risk estimates using BEIR VII models for standard and radiotherapy for early breast cancer. Med Phys 2012;39(10):5814-5824.
  15. Escobar PA, Smith MT, Vasishta A, Hubbard AE, Zhang L. Leukaemia-specific chromosome damage detected by comet with fluorescence in situ hybridization (comet-FISH). Mutagenesis 2007 Sep;22(5):321-327.
  16. Griffey RT, Sodickson A. Cumulative radiation exposure and cancer risk estimates in emergency department patients undergoing repeat or multiple CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2009 Apr;192(4):887-892.
  17. Curtis R, Freedman D, Ron E, Ries LAG, Hacker DG, Edwards BK, Tucker MA, Fraumeni JF Jr. New malignancies among cancer survivors: SEER cancer registries, 1973-2000. NIH Publication No. 05-5302. Bethesda, MD; 2006.
  18. Cheng HY, Chu CH, Chang WH, Hsu TC, Lin SC, Liu CC, Yang AM, Shih SC. Clinical analysis of multiple primary malignancies in the digestive system: a hospital-based study. World J Gastroenterol 2005 Jul;11(27):4215-4219.
  19. Neugut AI, Ahsan H, Robinson E. Pancreas cancer as a second primary malignancy. A population-based study. Cancer 1995 Aug;76(4):589-592.
  20. Neugut AI, Gold D. Gastrointestinal cancers. In: Neugut AI, Meadows AT, Robinson E, editors. Multiple primary cancers. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 1999. pp. 347-363.
  21. Pang L, Liu G, Shi H, Hu P, Li B, Cheng D. Nineteen cases with synchronous multiple primary cancers studied by 18F-FDG PET/CT. Hell J Nucl Med 2017;20(1):36-40.
  22. Yang Q, Wen SW, Oppenheimer L, Chen XK, Black D, Gao J, Walker MC. Association of caesarean delivery for first birth with placenta praevia and placental abruption in second pregnancy. BJOG 2007 May;114(5):609-613.
  23. Krasznai I, Rigo J Jr, Boze T, Papp Z. Uncommon type of placentation after previous cesarean deliveries. Obstet Gynecol 2003 Sep;102(3):549-551.
  24. Kurjak A, Barsic B. Changes of placental site diagnosed by repeated ultrasonic examination. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1977;56(3):161-165.
  25. Becker RH, Vonk R, Mende BC, Ragosch V, Entezami M. The relevance of placental location at 20–23 gestational weeks for prediction of placenta previa at delivery: evaluation of 8650 cases. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2001 Jun;17(6):496-501.
  26. Taipale P. Hiilesmaa V, Ylostalo P. Transvaginal ultrasonography at 18-23 weeks in predicting placenta previa at delivery. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1998 Dec;12(6):422-425.
  27. Oppenheimer L, Holmes P, Simpson N, Dabrowski A. Diagnosis of low-lying placenta: can migration in the third trimester predict outcome? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2001 Aug;18(2):100-102.
  28. Ghourab S. Third-trimester transvaginal ultrasonography in placenta previa: does the shape of the lower placental edge predict clinical outcome? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2001 Aug;18(2):103-108.
  29. Ghi T, Contro E, Martina T, Piva M, Morandi R, Orsini LF, Meriggiola MC, Pilu G, Morselli-Labate AM, De Aloysio D, et al. Cervical length and risk of antepartum bleeding in women with complete placenta previa. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2009 Feb;33(2):209-212.
  30. Sekiguchi A, Nakai A, Okuda N, Inde Y, Takeshita T. Consecutive cervical length measurements as a predictor of preterm cesarean section in complete placenta previa. J Clin Ultrasound 2015 Jan;43(1):17-22.
  31. Shin JE, Shin JC, Lee Y, Kim SJ. Serial change in cervical length for the prediction of emergency cesarean section in placenta previa. PLoS One 2016 Feb;11(2):e0149036.
  32. Saitoh M, Ishihara K, Sekiya T, Araki T. Anticipation of uterine bleeding in placenta previa based on vaginal sonographic evaluation. Gynecol Obstet Invest 2002;54(1):37-42.
  33. Droste S, Keil K. Expectant management of placenta praevia: cost benefit analysis of outpatient treatment. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1994 May;170(5 pt 1):1254-1257.
  34. Mouer JR. Placenta praevia: antepartum conservative management, inpatient versus outpatient. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1994 Jun;170(6):1683-1686.
  35. Dola CP, Garite TJ, Dowling DD, Friend D, Ahdoot D, Asrat T. Placenta previa: does its type affect pregnancy outcome? Am J Perinatol 2003 Oct;20(7):353-360.
  36. Nelson JP. Interventions for suspected placenta praevia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2003;2:CD001998.
  37. Arias F. Cervical cerclage for the temporary treatment of patients with placenta previa. Obstet Gynecol 1988 Apr;71(4):545-548.
  38. Oyelese KO, Smulian JC. Placenta previa, placenta accreta, and vasa previa. Obstet Gynecol 2006 Apr;107(4):927-941.
  39. Bhide A, Thilaganathan B. Recent advances in the management of placenta previa. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2004 Dec;16(6):447-451.
  40. Finberg HJ, Williams JW. Placenta accreta: prospective sonographic diagnosis in patients with placenta previa and prior cesarean section. J Ultrasound Med 1992 Jul;11(7): 333-343.
  41. O'Brien JM, Barton JR, Donaldson ES. The management of placenta percreta: conservative and operative strategies. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1996 Dec;175(6):1632-1638.
  42. Ouellet A, Sallout B, Oppenheimer LW. Outcomes of surgical versus conservative management of placenta accreta-percreta: systematic review of literature and case series. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003 Dec;189(6):S130.
  43. Mazouni C, Gorincour G, Juhan V, Bretelle F. Placenta accreta: a review of current advances in prenatal diagnosis. Placenta 2006 Jul;28(7):599-603.
  44. Abramowicz JS, Sheiner E. Ultrasound of the placenta: a systematic approach. Part I: imaging. Placenta 2008 Mar;29(3):225-240.
  45. Wu S, Kocherginsky M, Hibbard JU. Abnormal placentation: twenty-year analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005 May;192(5):1458-1461.
  46. Gielchinsky Y, Rojansky N, Fasouliotis SJ, Ezra Y. Placenta accretae—summary of 10 years: a survey of 310 cases. Placenta 2002 Feb-Mar;23(2-3):210-214.
  47. Comstock CH. Antenatal diagnosis of placenta accreta: a review. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2005 Jul;26(1):89-96.
  48. Shih JC, Palacios Jaraquemada JM, Su YN, Shyu MK, Lin CH, Lin SY, Lee CN. Role of three-dimensional power Doppler in the antenatal diagnosis of placenta accreta: comparison with gray-scale and color Doppler techniques. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2009 Feb;33(2):193-203.
  49. Lax A, Prince MR, Mennitt KW, Schwebach JR, Budorick NE. The value of specific MRI features in the evaluation of suspected placental invasion. Magn Reson Imaging 2007 Jan;25(1):87-93.
  50. Lim PS, Greenberg M, Edelson MI, Bell KA, Edmonds PR, Mackey AM. Utility of ultrasound and MRI in prenatal diagnosis of placenta accreta: a pilot study. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2011 Dec;197(6):1506-1513.
  51. Baughman WC, Corteville JE, Shah RR. Placenta accreta: spectrum of US and MR imaging findings. Radiographics 2008 Nov-Dec;28(7):1905-1916.
  52. Stanojevic M, Antsaklis P, Kadic AS, Predojevic M, Vladareanu R, Vladareanu S, Neto RM. Is Kurjak antenatal neurodevelopmental test ready for routine clinical application? Bucharest Consensus Statement. DSJUOG 2015 Jan;9(3):260-265.
  53. Rosier-van Dunne FM, van Wezel-Meijler G, Bakker MP, Odendaal HJ, de Vries JI. Fetal general movements and brain sonography in a population at risk for preterm birth. Early Hum Dev 2010 Feb;86(2):107-111.
  54. Kurjak A, Stanojevic M, Andonotopo W, Scazzocchio-Duenas E, Azumendi G, Carrera JM. Fetal behavior assessed in all three trimesters of normal pregnancy by four-dimensional ultrasonography. Croat Med J 2005 Oct;46(5):772-780.
  55. Stanojevic M, Talic A, Miskovic B, Vasilj O, Shaddad AN, Ahmed B, Kadic AS, Predojevic M, Vladareanu R, Lebit D, Abu-Yaqoub S, et al. An attempt to standardize Kurjak's antenatal neurodevelopmental test: Osaka Consensus Statement. DSJUOG 2011 Oct-Dec;5(4):317-329.
  56. Low JA, Galbraith RS, Muir DW, Killen HL, Pater EA, Karchmar EJ. Factors associated with motor and cognitive deficits in children after intrapartum fetal hypoxia. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1984 Mar;148(5):533-539.
  57. Kurjak A, Miskovic B, Stanojevic M, Amiel-Tison C, Ahmed B, Azumendi G, Vasilj O, Andonotopo W, Turudic T, Salihagic- Kadic A. New scoring system for fetal neurobehavior assessed by three- and four-dimensional sonography. J Perinat Med 2008 Feb;36(1):73-81.
  58. Nelson C, Silverstein FS. Acute disruption of cytochrome oxidase activity in brain in a perinatal rat stroke model. Pediatr Res 1994 Jul;36(1 Pt 1):12-19.
  59. Visser GH, Mulder EJ, Tessa Ververs FF. Fetal behavioral teratology. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2010 Oct;23(Suppl 3):14-16.
  60. Visser GH, Bekedam DJ, Mulder EJ, van Ballegooie E. Delayed emergence of fetal behavior in type-1 diabetic women. Early Hum Dev 1985 Nov;12(2):167-172.
  61. Aladjem S, Feria A, Rest J, Gull K, O'Connor M. Effect of maternal glucose load on fetal activity. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1979 Jun;134(3):276-280.
  62. Eller DP, Stramm SL, Newman RB. The effect of maternal intravenous glucose administration on fetal activity. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1992 Oct;167(4 Pt 1):1071-1074.
  63. Gelman SR, Spellacy WN, Wood S, Birk SA, Buhi WC. Fetal movements and ultrasound: effect of maternal intravenous glucose administration. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1980 Jun;137(4):459-461.
  64. Goodman JD. The effect of intravenous glucose on human fetal breathing measured by Doppler ultrasound. Br J Obstet Gynecol 1980 Dec;87(12):1080-1083.
  65. Miller FC, Skiba H, Klapholz H. The effect of maternal blood sugar levels on fetal activity. Obstet Gynecol 1978 Dec;52(6):662-665.
  66. Richardson B, Briggs ML, Toomey C, Burry KJ, O'Grady JP. The effect of maternal glucose administration on the specificity of the nonstress test. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1983 Jan;145(2):141-146.
  67. Allen CL, Kisilevsky BS. Fetal behavior in diabetic and nondiabetic pregnant women: an exploratory study. Dev Psychobiol 1999 Jul;35(1):69-80.
  68. Edelberg SC, Dierker L, Kalhan S, Rosen MG. Decreased fetal movements with sustained maternal hyperglycemia using the glucose clamp technique. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1987 May;156(5):1101-1105.
  69. Holden KP, Jovanovic L, Druzin ML, Peterson CM. Increased fetal activity with low maternal blood glucose levels in pregnancies complicated by diabetes. Am J Perinatol 1984 Jan;1(2):161-164.
  70. Bocking AD. Observations of biophysical activities in the normal fetus. Clin Perinatol 1989 Sep;16(3):583-594.
  71. Bocking A, Adamson L, Carmichael L, Patrick J, Probert C. Effect of intravenous glucose injection on human maternal and fetal heart rate at term. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1984 Feb;148(4):414-420.
  72. Bocking A, Adamson L, Cousin A, Campbell K, Carmichael L, Natale R, Patrick J. Effects of intravenous glucose injections on human fetal breathing movements and gross fetal body movements at 38 to 40 weeks’ gestational age. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1982 Mar;142(6 Pt 1):606-611.
  73. Reece EA, Hagay Z, Roberts AB, DeGennaro N, Homko CJ, Connolly-Diamond M, Sherwin R, Tamborlane WV, Diamond MP. Fetal Doppler and behavioral responses during hypoglycemia induced with the insulin clamp technique in pregnant diabetic women. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1995 Jan;172(1 Pt 1):151-155.
  74. Patrick J, Campbell K, Carmichael L, Natale R, Richardson B. Patterns of gross fetal body movements over 24-hour observation intervals during the last 10 weeks of pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1982 Feb;142(4):363-371.
  75. Ornoy A, Ratzon N, Greenbaum C, Peretz E, Soriano D, Dulitzky M. Neurobehavior of school age children born to diabetic mothers. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 1998 Sep;79(2):F94-F99.
  76. Wolf, A. Developmental evaluation on early school age children born to gestational diabetic mothers. Israel: Hebrew University; 1997.
  77. Mulder EJ, Leiblum DM, Visser GH. Fetal breathing movements in late diabetic pregnancy: relationship to fetal heart rate patterns and Braxton Hicks’ contractions. Early Hum Dev 1995 Nov;43(3):225-232.
  78. Schulte FJ, Michaelis R, Nolte R, Albert G, Parl U, Lasson U. Brain and behavioral maturation in newborn infants of diabetic mothers. I. Nerve conduction and EEG patterns. Neuropadiatrie 1969 Jan-Jul;1(1):24-35.
  79. Devoe LD, Youssef AA, Castillo RA, Croom CS. Fetal biophysical activities in third-trimester pregnancies complicated by diabetes mellitus. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1994 Aug;171(2):298-303.
  80. Dierker LJ Jr, Pillay S, Sorokin Y, Rosen MG. The change in fetal activity periods in diabetic and nondiabetic pregnancies. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1982 May;143(2):181-185.
  81. Doherty NN, Hepper PG. Habituation in fetuses of diabetic mothers. Early Hum Dev 2000 Aug;59(2):85-93.
  82. Kainer F, Prechtl HF, Engele H, Einspieler C. Assessment of the quality of general movements in fetuses and infants of women with type-1 diabetes mellitus. Early Hum Dev 1997 Nov;50(1):13-25.
  83. Mulder EJ, O'Brien MJ, Lems YL, Visser GH, Prechtl HF. Body and breathing movements in near-term fetuses and newborn infants of type-1 diabetic women. Early Hum Dev 1990 Nov;24(2):131-152.
  84. Mulder EJ, Visser GH. Growth and motor development in fetuses of women with type-1 diabetes. I. Early growth patterns. Early Hum Dev 1991 May;25(2):91-106.
  85. Mulder EJ, Visser GH. Growth and motor development in fetuses of women with type-1 diabetes. II. Emergence of specific movement patterns. Early Hum Dev 1991 May;25(2):107-115.
  86. Mulder EJ, Visser GH. Impact of early growth delay on subsequent fetal growth and functional development: a study on diabetic pregnancy. Early Hum Dev 1992 Dec;31(2):91-95.
  87. Mulder EJ, Visser GH, Bekedam DJ, Prechtl HF. Emergence of behavioral states in fetuses of type-1 diabetic women. Early Hum Dev 1987 Jul;15(4):231-251.
  88. Mulder EJ, Visser GH, Morssink LP, de Vries JI. Growth and motor development in fetuses of women with type-1 diabetes. III. First trimester quantity of fetal movement patterns. Early Hum Dev 1991 May;25(2):117-133.
  89. Aberg A, Westbom L, Kallen B. Congenital malformations among infants whose mothers had gestational diabetes or preexisting diabetes. Early Hum Dev 2001 Mar;61(2):85-95.
  90. Deregnier RA, Nelson CA, Thomas KM, Wewerka S, Georgieff MK. Neurophysiologic evaluation of auditory recognition memory in healthy newborn infants and infants of diabetic mothers. J Pediatr 2000 Dec;137(6):777-784.
  91. Nelson CA, Wewerka S, Thomas KM, Tribby-Walbridge S, deRegnier R, Georgieff M. Neurocognitive sequelae of infants of diabetic mothers. Behav Neurosci 2000 Oct;114(5):950-956.
  92. Reece EA, Homko CJ. Infant of the diabetic mother. Semin Perinatol 1994 Oct;18(5):459-469.
  93. Reece EA, Homko CJ. Why do diabetic women deliver malformed infants? Clin Obstet Gynecol 2000 Mar;43(1):32-45.
  94. Rizzo T, Metzger BE, Burns WJ, Burns K. Correlations between antepartum maternal metabolism and intelligence of offspring. N Engl J Med 1991 Sep;325(13):911-916.
  95. Rizzo TA, Metzger BE, Dooley SL, Cho NH. Early malnutrition and child neurobehavioral development: insights from the study of children of diabetic mothers. Child Dev 1997 Feb;68(1):26-38.
  96. Schwartz R, Teramo KA. Effects of diabetic pregnancy on the fetus and newborn. Semin Perinatol 2000 Apr;24(2):120-135.
  97. Vaarasmaki MS, Hartikainen A, Anttila M, Pramila S, Koivisto M. Factors predicting peri- and neonatal outcome in diabetic pregnancy. Early Hum Dev 2000 Jul;59(1):61-70.
  98. Robertson SS, Dierker LJ. Fetal cyclic motor activity in diabetic pregnancies: sensitivity to maternal blood glucose. Dev Psychobiol 2003 Jan;42(1):9-16.
  99. Accardo PJ, Blondis TA, Whitman BY. Disorders of attention and activity level in a referral population. Pediatrics 1990 Mar;85(3 Pt 2):426-431.
  100. Ornoy A, Uriel L, Tennenbaum A. Inattention, hyperactivity and speech delay at 2-4 years of age as a predictor for ADDADHD syndrome. Isr J Psychiatry Relat Sci 1993;30(3):155-163.
  101. Smyth TR. Impaired motor skill (clumsiness) in otherwise normal children: a review. Child Care Health Dev 1992 Sep-Oct;18(5):283-300.
  102. Petersen MB, Pedersen SA, Greisen G, Pedersen JF, Mølsted- Pedersen L. Early growth delay in diabetic pregnancy: relation to psychomotor development at age 4. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1988 Feb;296(6622):598-600.
  103. Sells CJ, Robinson NM, Brown Z, Knopp RH. Long-term developmental follow-up of infants of diabetic mothers. J Pediatr 1994 Jul;125(1):S9-S17.
  104. Vladareanu R, Lebit D, Constantinescu S. Ultrasound assessment of fetal neurobehaviour in high risk pregnancies. DSJUOG 2012 Apr-Jun;6(2):132-147.
  105. Talic A, Kurjak A, Ahmed B, Stanojevic M, Predojevic M, Kadic AS, Di Renzo GC. The potential of 4D sonography in the assessment of fetal behavior in high-risk pregnancies. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2011 Jul;24(7):948-954.
  106. Bekedam DJ, Visser GH, de Vries JJ, Prechtl HF. Motor behaviour in the growth retarded fetus. Early Hum Dev 1985 Nov;12(2):155-165.
  107. Cioni G, Prechtl HF. Preterm and early postterm motor behaviour in low-risk premature infants. Early Hum Dev 1990 Sep;23(3):159-191.
  108. Seme-Ciglenecki P. Predictive value of assessment of general movements for neurological development of highrisk preterm infants: comparative study. Croat Med J 2003 Dec;44(6):721-727.
  109. Abo-Yaqoub S, Kurjak A, Mohammed AB, Shadad A, Abdel-Maaboud M. The role of 4-D ultrasonography in prenatal assessment of fetal neurobehaviour and prediction of neurological outcome. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2012 Mar;25(3):231-236.
  110. Athanasiadis AP, Mikos T, Tambakoudis GP, Theodoridis TD, Papastergiou M, Assimakopoulos E, Tarlatzis BC. Neurodevelopmental fetal assessment using KANET scoring system in low and high-risk pregnancies. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2013 Mar;26(4):363-368.
  111. Fauser BC, Tarlatzis BC, Rebar RW, Legro RS, Balen AH, Lobo R, Carmina E, Chang J, Yildiz BO, Laven JS, et al. Consensus on women's health aspects of polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS): the Amsterdam ESHRE/ASRM-Sponsored 3rd PCOS Consensus Workshop Group. Fertil Steril 2012 Jan;97(1):28-38.e25
  112. Sirmans SM, Pate KA. Epidemiology, diagnosis and management of polycystic ovary syndrome. Clin Epidemiol 2014; 6:1-13.
  113. Fauser BC, Diedrich K, Bouchard P, Domínguez F, Matzuk M, Franks S, Hamamah S, Simón C, Devroey P, Ezcurra D, et al. Contemporary genetic technologies and female reproduction. Human Reproduction Update 2011 Nov;17(6):829-847.
  114. Balen A, Conway G, Kaltsas G. Polycystic ovary syndrome: the spectrum of the disorder in 1741 patients. Hum Reprod 1995 Aug;10(8):2107-2111.
  115. Azziz R, Sanchez L, Knochenhauer ES, Moran C, Lazenby J, Stephens KC, Taylor K, Boots LR. Androgen excess in women: experience with over 1000 consecutive patients. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2004 Feb;89(2):453-462.
  116. Wild S, Pierpoint T, McKeigue P, Jacobs H. Cardiovascular disease in women with polycystic ovary syndrome at longterm follow-up: a retrospective cohort study. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 2000 May;52(5):595-600.
  117. Hollinrake E, Abreu A, Maifeld M, Van Voorhis BJ, Dokras A. Increased risk of depressive disorders in women with polycystic ovary syndrome. Fertil Steril 2007 Jun;87(6): 1369-1376.
  118. Zawadski JK, Dunaif A. Diagnostic criteria for polycystic ovary syndrome. In: Givens JHF, Merriman G, editors. The polycystic ovary syndrome. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell Scientific; 1992. p. 377-384.
  119. Rotterdam ESHRE/ASRM-Sponsored PCOS Consensus Workshop Group. Revised 2003 consensus on diagnostic criteria and long-term health risks related to polycystic ovary syndrome. Fertil Steril 2004 Jan;81(1):19-25.
  120. Azziz R, Carmina E, DeWailly D, Diamanti-Kandarakis E, Escobar-Morreale HF, Futterweit W, Janssen OE, Legro RS, Norman RJ, Taylor AE, et al. Position statement: criteria for defining polycystic ovary syndrome as a predominantly hyperandrogenic syndrome: an Androgen Excess Society guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2006 Nov;91(11):4237-4245.
  121. Lujan ME, Jarrett BY, Brooks ED, Reines JK, Peppin AK, Muhn N, Haider E, Pierson RA, Chizen DR. Updated ultrasound criteria for polycystic ovary syndrome: reliable thresholds for elevated follicle population and ovarian volume. Hum Reprod 2013 May;28(5):1361-1368.
  122. Badawy A, Elnashar A. Treatment options for polycystic ovary syndrome. Int J Womens Health 2011 Feb;3:25-35.
  123. ACOG Committee on Practice Bulletins—Gynecology. ACOG Practice Bulletin No 108: Polycystic ovary syndrome. Obstet Gynecol 2009 Oct;114(4):936-949.
  124. Thessaloniki ESHRE/ASRM-Sponsored PCOS Consensus Workshop Group Consensus on infertility treatment related to polycystic ovary syndrome. Fertil Steril 2008 Mar;89(3): 505-522.
  125. Balen AH. Ovulation induction in the management of anovulatory polycystic ovary syndrome. Mol Cell Endocrinol 2013 Jul;373(1-2):77-82.
  126. Berridge DL, Winter TC. Saline infusion sonohysterography: technique, indications, and imaging findings. J Ultrasound Med 2004 Jan;23(1):97-112.
  127. Allison SJ, Horrow MM, Kim HY, Lev-Toaff AS. Salineinfused sonohysterography: tips for achieving greater success. Radiographics 2011 Nov-Dec;31(7):1991-2004.
  128. O'Neill MJ. Sonohysterography. Radiol Clin North Am 2003 Jul;41(4):781-797.
  129. Bonnamy L, Marret H, Perrotin F, Body G, Berger C, Lansac J. Sonohysterography: a prospective survey of results and complications in 81 patients. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2002 Apr;102(1):42-47.
  130. Lindheim SR, Adsuar N, Kushner DM, Pritts EA, Olive DL. Sonohysterography: a valuable tool in evaluating the female pelvis. Obstet Gynecol Surv 2003 Nov;58(11):770-784.
  131. Lindheim SR, Sprague C, Winter TC. Hysterosalpingography and sonohysterography: lessons in technique. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2006 Jan;186(1):24-29.
  132. Jeanty P, Besnard S, Arnold A, Turner C, Crum P. Air-contrast sonohysterography as a first step assessment of tubal patency. J Ultrasound Med 2000 Aug;19(8):519-527.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.