Euroasian Journal of Hepato-Gastroenterology

Register      Login

VOLUME 7 , ISSUE 2 ( July-December, 2017 ) > List of Articles

RESEARCH ARTICLE

Effect of Different Sedation Regimes on Cognitive Functions in Colonoscopy

Perihan Ekmekçi, Gulbanu Erkan, Hakan Yilmaz, Baturay K Kazbek, Ulku C Köksoy, Güler Doganay, Filiz Tüzüner

Citation Information : Ekmekçi P, Erkan G, Yilmaz H, Kazbek BK, Köksoy UC, Doganay G, Tüzüner F. Effect of Different Sedation Regimes on Cognitive Functions in Colonoscopy. Euroasian J Hepatogastroenterol 2017; 7 (2):158-162.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10018-1239

License: CC BY 3.0

Published Online: 01-12-2017

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2017; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


Abstract

Aim

To compare the effects of propofol/remifentanil and meperidine/midazolam on postprocedure cognitive function.

Materials and methods

A total of 100 American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score I to III patients undergoing elective colonoscopy were taken into the study and divided into two groups. Exclusion criteria were patient refusal, mini mental test (MMT) <26, The Amsterdam Preoperative Anxiety and Information Scale (APAIS) >10, advanced cardiopulmonary or psychiatric disease, chronic alcohol abuse, morbid obesity, and known allergy to study drugs. In group MM, 2 mg midazolam and 20 mg meperidine was given intravenously and additional 1 to 2 mg midazolam and 20 mg meperidine (with a maximum total of 5 mg midazolam and 50 mg meperidine) was given when bispectral index (BIS) was >80. In group RP, 100 μg/kg/minute propofol infusion and 1 μg/kg remifentanil bolus was administered and additional 0.5 μg/kg remifentanil bolus was given when BIS was >80. Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation scale (OAA/S) and Facial Pain Score (FPS) values were recorded. Cognitive function was measured by Trieger Dot Test (TDT) and Digit Symbol Substitution Test (DSST).

Results

The study was concluded with 100 patients. Heart rate was slower and BIS values were lower in group RP throughout the procedure. Blood pressure was lower in group RP without clinical significance. There was no difference concerning recovery time and visual analog scores (VASs). In group MM, TDT scores were higher and DSST scores were lower. Satisfaction was higher in group RP.

Conclusion

Propofol/remifentanil combination is better than meperidine/midazolam combination concerning cognitive function in sedation for colonoscopy.

Clinical significance

The addition of BIS monitorization to evaluate the depth of sedation and the negative effects of midazolam meperidine combination on postprocedural cognitive function.

How to cite this article

Ekmekçi P, Erkan G, Yilmaz H, Kazbek BK, Köksoy UC, Doganay G, Tüzüner F. Effect of Different Sedation Regimes on Cognitive Functions in Colonoscopy. Euroasian J Hepato-Gastroenterol 2017;7(2):158-162.


  1. Synergistic sedation with midazolam and propofol versus midazolam and pethidine in colonoscopies: a prospective, randomized study. Am J Gastroenterol 2002 Aug;97(8):1963-1967.
  2. Propofol for endoscopic sedation: a protocol for safe and effective administration by the gastroenterologist. Gastrointest Endosc 2003 Nov;58(5):725-732.
  3. Synergistic sedation with oral midazolam as a premedication and intravenous propofol versus intravenous propofol alone in upper gastrointestinal endoscopies in children: a prospective, randomized study. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2006 Aug;43(2):195-199.
  4. Preparation, premedication, and surveillance. Endoscopy 2006 Feb;38(2):105-109.
  5. Preparation, premedication, and surveillance. Endoscopy 2005;37:101-109.
  6. Non-anaesthesiologists should not be allowed to administer propofol for procedural sedation: a Consensus Statement of 21 European National Societies of Anaesthesia. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2011 Aug;28(8):580-584.
  7. Retraction of endorsement: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, European Society of Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Nurses and Associates, and the European Society of Anaesthesiology Guideline: non-anesthesiologist administration of propofol for GI endoscopy. Endoscopy 2012 Mar;44(3):302.
  8. Early cognitive impairment after sedation for colonoscopy: the effect of adding midazolam and/or fentanyl to propofol. Anesth Analg 2009 Nov;109(5):1448-1455
  9. Evaluation of postprocedure cognitive function using 3 distinct standard sedation regimens for endoscopic procedures. AANA J 2014 Apr;82(2):133-139
  10. Safety of continuous propofol sedation for endoscopic procedures in elderly patients. Rev Esp Enferm Dig 2011 Feb;103(2):76-82.
  11. Intermittent boluses versus pump continuous infusion for endoscopist-directed propofol administration in colonoscopy. Rev Esp Enferm Dig 2013 Aug;105(7):378-384.
  12. Quality of psychomotor recovery after propofol sedation for routine endoscopy: a randomized and controlled study. Endoscopy 2006 Jul;38(7):677-683.
  13. Remifentanil compared with midazolam and pethidine sedation during colonoscopy: a prospective, randomized study. Dig Dis Sci 2008 Jan;53(1):34-40.
  14. Can remifentanil be a better choice than propofol for colonoscopy during monitored anesthesia care? Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2006 Jul;50(6):736-741.
  15. Total intravenous versus inhalational anaesthesia for colonoscopy: a prospective study of clinical recovery and psychomotor function. Anaesth Intensive Care 2001 Apr; 29(2):124-136.
  16. Propofol versus remifentanil for monitored anaesthesia care during colonoscopy. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2003 Jun;20(6):461-466
  17. Efficacy of bispectral index monitoring as an adjunct to propofol deep sedation for ERCP: a randomized controlled trial. Endoscopy 2009 Dec;41(12):1046-1051.
  18. Moderate level sedation during endoscopy: a prospective study using low-dose propofol, meperidine/fentanyl, and midazolam. Gastrointest Endosc 2004 Jun; 59(7):795-803.
  19. Comparison of the amnesic effects of midazolam and diazepam. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1991;103(4):545-550.
  20. Bispectral inndex versus standard monitoring in sedation for endoscopic procedures: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Dig Dis Sci. 2016 Mar;61(3):814-824.
  21. The effects of practice on the cognitive test performance of neurologically normal individuals assessed at brief test-retest intervals. J Int Neuropsychol Soc 2003 Mar;9(3):419-428.
  22. The role of sigmoidoscopy and colonoscopy in the diagnosis and management of lower gastrointestinal disorders: technique, indications, and contraindications. Med Clin N Am 2002 Nov;86(6):1217-1252.
  23. The reliability and validity of Trieger tests as a measure of recovery from general anesthesia in a day-care surgery unit. Anesth Prog 1983 Sep-Oct;30(5):152-155.
  24. Recovery of psychomotor function after total intravenous anesthesia with remifentanil-propofol or fentanyl-propofol. J Anesth 2012 Feb;26(1):34-38.
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.