Euroasian journal of hepato-gastroenterology

Register      Login

VOLUME 12 , ISSUE 1 ( January-June, 2022 ) > List of Articles


Imaging of Mischievous Intra-abdominal Fat Presenting with Abdominal Pain: A Pictorial Review

Ranjan K Patel, Shruti Mittal, Sapna Singh

Keywords : Acute pancreatitis, Epiploic appendagitis, Fat necrosis, Intra-abdominal, Mesenteric panniculitis, Omental infarction, Sclerosing mesenteritis

Citation Information : Patel RK, Mittal S, Singh S. Imaging of Mischievous Intra-abdominal Fat Presenting with Abdominal Pain: A Pictorial Review. Euroasian J Hepatogastroenterol 2022; 12 (1):45-49.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10018-1355

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 13-07-2022

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2022; The Author(s).


Aim: To briefly discuss the imaging features of different types of intra-abdominal fat necrosis. Background: Trauma and ischemic insult may result in intra-abdominal fat necrosis. Fat necrosis may present with acute abdomen, clinically simulating with other etiologies, such as acute diverticulitis and acute appendicitis. Main body: Imaging plays a crucial role in making the exact diagnosis and differentiating it from other pathologies that may require surgical intervention. Computed tomography (CT) is the most commonly used imaging modality. A small fat attenuation lesion with a hyperattenuating rim in contact with the ventral surface of the sigmoid colon indicates epiploic appendagitis while a larger fat-attenuation lesion on the right side of the abdomen in between the colon and anterior abdominal wall indicates omental infarction. Fat stranding at the root of the mesentery with fat ring sign represents inflammatory mesenteric panniculitis while retractile or sclerosing mesenteritis appears as a fibrotic spiculated mass with or without calcification, mimicking mesenteric carcinoid. In patients with acute pancreatitis, the amount of inflamed fat correlates with clinical severity and outcome. Conclusions: Familiarity with the imaging features of different types of intraabdominal fat necrosis helps in establishing an accurate diagnosis, thus avoiding unnecessary intervention.

PDF Share
  1. Grundy SM. Adipose tissue and metabolic syndrome: too much, too little or neither. Eur J Clin Invest 2015;45(11):1209–1217. DOI: 10.1111/eci.12519.
  2. Aguilar-García JJ, Alcaide-León P, Vargas-Serrano B. Necrosis grasa intraabdominal [Intraabdominal fat necrosis]. Radiologia 2012;54(5):449–456. DOI: 10.1016/j.rx.2011.07.006.
  3. Singh AK, Gervais DA, Hahn PF, et al. Acute epiploic appendagitis and its mimics. Radiographic 2005;25(6):1521–1534. DOI: 10.1148/rg.256055030.
  4. Schnedl WJ, Krause R, Tafeit E, et al. Insights into epiploic appendagitis. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2011;8(1):45–49. DOI: 10.1038/nrgastro.2010.189.
  5. Giannis D, Matenoglou E, Sidiropoulou MS, et al. Epiploic appendagitis: pathogenesis, clinical findings and imaging clues of a misdiagnosed mimicker. Ann Transl Med 2019;7(24):814. DOI: 10.21037/atm.2019.12.74.
  6. Kamaya A, Federle MP, Desser TS. Imaging manifestations of abdominal fat necrosis and its mimics. Radiographics 2011;31(7):2021–2034. DOI: 10.1148/rg.317115046.
  7. Esposito F, Di Serafino M, Mauro A, et al. Not only fat: omental infarction and its mimics in children. Clinical and ultrasound findings: a pictorial review. J Ultrasound 2020;23(4):621–629. DOI: 10.1007/s40477-020-00492-5.
  8. Tonerini M, Calcagni F, Lorenzi S, et al. Omental infarction and its mimics: imaging features of acute abdominal conditions presenting with fat stranding greater than the degree of bowel wall thickening. Emerg Radiol 2015;22(4):431–436. DOI: 10.1007/s10140-015- 1302-0.
  9. Baldisserotto M, Maffazzoni DR, Dora MD. Omental infarction in children: color Doppler sonography correlated with surgery and pathology findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2005;184(1):156–162. DOI: 10.2214/ajr.184.1.01840156.
  10. Issa I, Baydoun H. Mesenteric panniculitis: various presentations and treatment regimens. World J Gastroenterol 2009;15(30):3827–3830. DOI: 10.3748/wjg.15.3827.
  11. Buragina G, Magenta Biasina A, Carrafiello G. Clinical and radiological features of mesenteric panniculitis: a critical overview. Acta Biomed 2019;90(4):411–422. DOI: 10.23750/abm.v90i4.7696.
  12. Hussein MR, Abdelwahed SR. Mesenteric panniculitis: an update. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2015;9(1):67–78. DOI: 10.1586/17474124.2014.939632.
  13. Horton KM, Lawler LP, Fishman EK. CT findings in sclerosing mesenteritis (panniculitis): spectrum of disease. Radiographics 2003;23(6):1561–1567. DOI: 10.1148/rg.1103035010.
  14. McLaughlin PD, Filippone A, Maher MM. The “misty mesentery”: mesenteric panniculitis and its mimics. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2013;200(2):W116–W123. DOI: 10.2214/AJR.12.8493.
  15. Sabaté JM, Torrubia S, Maideu J, et al. Sclerosing mesenteritis: imaging findings in 17 patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1999;172(3):625–629. DOI: 10.2214/ajr.172.3.10063848.
  16. Ezhapilli SR, Moreno CC, Small WC, et al. Mesenteric masses: approach to differential diagnosis at MRI with histopathologic correlation. J Magn Reson Imaging 2014;40(4):753–769. DOI: 10.1002/jmri.24690.
  17. Noel P, Patel K, Durgampudi C, et al. Peripancreatic fat necrosis worsens acute pancreatitis independent of pancreatic necrosis via unsaturated fatty acids increased in human pancreatic necrosis collections. Gut 2016;65(1):100–111. DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2014-308043.
  18. Gupta P, Dawra S, Chandel K, et al. Fat-modified computed tomography severity index (CTSI) is a better predictor of severity and outcome in patients with acute pancreatitis compared with modified CTSI. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2020;45(5):1350–1358. DOI: 10.1007/s00261-020-02473-y.
  19. Chen H, Tsang Y, Wu C, et al. Perirenal fat necrosis secondary to hemorrhagic pancreatitis, mimicking retroperitoneal liposarcoma: CT manifestation. Abdom Imaging 1996;21(6):546–548. DOI: 10.1007/s002619900123.
  20. Pedrosa I, Naidich JJ, Rofsky NM, et al. Renal pseudotumors due to fat necrosis in acute pancreatitis. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2001;25(2):236–238. DOI: 10.1097/00004728-200103000-00014.
  21. Takao H, Yamahira K, Watanabe T. Encapsulated fat necrosis mimicking abdominal liposarcoma: computed tomography findings. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2004;28(2):193–194. DOI: 10.1097/00004728-200403000-00007.
  22. Andaç N, Baltacioglu F, Cimşit NC, et al. Fat necrosis mimicking liposarcoma in a patient with pelvic lipomatosis. CT findings. Clin Imaging 2003;27(2):109–111. DOI: 10.1016/s0899-7071(02)00519-3.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.