Euroasian Journal of Hepato-Gastroenterology

Register      Login

VOLUME 11 , ISSUE 1 ( January-June, 2021 ) > List of Articles

Original Article

Comparative Analysis of Early versus Late Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Following Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreaticography in Cases of Cholelithiasis with Choledocholithiasis

Apoorv Goel, Shyam Kothari, Roli Bansal

Keywords : Choledocholithiasis, Cholelithiasis, Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreaticography

Citation Information : Goel A, Kothari S, Bansal R. Comparative Analysis of Early versus Late Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Following Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreaticography in Cases of Cholelithiasis with Choledocholithiasis. Euroasian J Hepatogastroenterol 2021; 11 (1):11-13.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10018-1338

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 28-06-2021

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2021; The Author(s).


Introduction: A preferred treatment for cholelithiasis with choledocholithiasis is endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreaticography (ERCP) followed by laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC), which can be performed early (within 72 hours) or can be delayed for 6 to 8 weeks. This study is conducted to compare and analyze the outcome of early versus late LC following common bile duct (CBD) clearance by ERCP and determine the optimum timing for performing LC post-ERCP. Materials and methods: This comparative analysis was conducted at St Joseph Hospital, Ghaziabad, from September 2019 to March 2021 on 89 cases of cholelithiasis with choledocholithiasis. Patients were divided into two groups. Group I (n = 45) patients underwent early LC within 72 hours post-ERCP and group II (n = 44) patients underwent late LC after an interval of 8 weeks. Various preoperative, perioperative, and postoperative clinical parameters like operative difficulty, complications, surgery duration, hospital stay, and conversion to open cholecystectomy were analyzed. Results: There was no significant difference in demographic and laboratory findings in both groups. Group I patients had significantly shorter hospital stay and less operative difficulty. The duration of surgery was significantly low in group I. There was no significant difference in rate of conversion to open cholecystectomy. Conclusion: Early LC post-ERCP is associated with short hospital stay and duration of surgery and less operative difficulty and complications. Therefore, we recommend that LC can be safely performed within 48 to 72 hours after ERCP.

  1. Schirmer BD, Edge SB, Dix J, et al. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Treatment of choice for symptomatic cholelithiasis. Ann Surg 1991;213:665–676. DOI: 10.1097/00000658-199106000-00018.
  2. Reinders JSK, Gouma DJ, Heisterkamp J, et al. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is more difficult after a previous endoscopic retrograde cholangiography. HPB 2013;15:230–234. DOI: 10.1111/j.1477-2574.2012.00582.x.
  3. Phillips MS, Marks JM. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: general principles. SAGES Man 2012;2012:411–425. Available at:
  4. Mann K, Belgaumkar AP, Singh S. Post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiography laparoscopic cholecystectomy: challenging but safe. JSLS 2013;17:371–375. DOI: 10.4293/108680813X13654754535511.
  5. Salman B, Yilmaz U, Kerem M, et al. The timing of laparoscopic cholecystectomy after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreaticography in cholelithiasis coexisting with choledocholithiasis. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 2009;16:832–836. DOI: 10.1007/s00534-009-0169-4.
  6. Ercan M, Bostancı EB, Teke Z, et al. Predictive factors for conversion to open surgery in patients undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2010;20:427–434. DOI: 10.1089/lap.2009.0457.
  7. Sugrue M, Sahebally SM, Ansaloni L, et al. Grading operative findings at laparoscopic cholecystectomy- a new scoring system. World J Emerg Surg 2015;10:14. DOI: 10.1186/s13017-015-0005-x.
  8. Sahu D, Mathew MJ, Reddy PK. Outcome in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy following ERCP; Does timing of surgery really matter? J Minim Invasive Surg Sci 2015;4:e25226. Available at:
  9. Aziret M, Karaman K, Ercan M, et al. Early laparoscopic cholecystectomy is associated with less risk of complications after the removal of common bile duct stones by endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Turk J Gastroenterol 2019;30(4):336–344. DOI: 10.5152/tjg.2018.18272.
  10. Sahoo R, Samal D, Pradhan A, et al. Optimal timing of laparoscopic cholecystectomy after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Int Surg J 2017;4:3504–3506. DOI: 10.18203/2349-2902.isj20174101.
  11. Friis C, Rothman JP, Burcharth J, et al. Optimal timing for laparoscopic cholecystectomy after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: a systematic review. Scand J Surg 2018;107(2):99–106. DOI: 10.1177/1457496917748224.
  12. Morino M, Baracchi F, Miglietta C, et al. Preoperative endoscopic sphincterotomy versus laparoendoscopic rendezvous in patients with gallbladder and bile duct stones. Ann Surg 2006;244:889–896. DOI: 10.1097/01.sla.0000246913.74870.fc.
  13. Akaraviputh T, Rattanapan T, Lohsiriwat V, et al. A same day approach for choledocholithiasis using endoscopic stone removal followed by laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a retrospective study. J Med Assoc Thai 2009;92(1):8–11. Available at:
  14. Zang J, Zhang C, Zhou H. Early laparoscopic cholecystectomy after endoscopic common bile duct stone extraction: the experience from a developing country. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2011;21(2):120–122. DOI: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e318213c7b8.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.